Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Philosophy & Social Criticism
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Landry, L. Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Beyond the ‘French Fries and the Frankfurter’

An agenda for critical theory

Lorraine Y. Landry

Marquette University, Department of Philosophy, Milwaukee, WI, USA

Debates between Habermas and the poststructuralists - specifically, Derrida, Foucault and Lyotard - over the nature of critiques of Enlightenment rationality and modernity are investigated in order to argue for an agenda for critical theory beyond the ‘French Fries and the Frankfurter’.1 Part I interrogates key elements of Habermas’ theory of communicative rationality in his reconstruction of Enlightenment modernity and his critique of the poststructuralists. This orients the discussion toward an evaluation of Habermas’ neo-Kantianism, theory of language (discourse ethics), and the ‘critique’ he employs in his bid to defend and complete the project of modernity.

Part II delineates some common ground between Habermas and the post-structuralists and argues for the value of maintaining a fruitful tension among their critiques of Enlightenment modernity. Points of unproductive tension among their critiques are taken up in light of the above value. These generally pertain to commitment to neo-Kantian approaches to critique, linguistic relativism and philosophical scepticism. The conclusion indicates that there are features of the constructive tension in the postmodernism debates which are integrally related to Marx’s work. Indeed, the debates’ contemporary perspectives upon and commitment to critical-practical engagement with ideological features of the Enlightenment legacy and capitalism can be revitalized by the contributions of Marx’s materialist critique.

Key Words: critical theory • Derrida • Enlightenment modernity • Foucault • Habermas • Lyotard • Marx • postmodernism debates

Philosophy & Social Criticism, Vol. 26, No. 2, 99-129 (2000)
DOI: 10.1177/019145370002600205


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?