This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by van Aaken, A. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Deliberative institutional economics, or DoesHomo oeconomicus argue?

A proposal for combining new institutional economics with discourse theory

Faculty of Law, Humboldt University, Berlin, Germany

Institutional economics and discourse theory stand unconnected next to each other, in spite of the fact that they both ask for the legitimacy of institutions (normative) and the functioning and effectiveness of institutions (positive). Both use as theoretical constructions rational individuals and the concept of consensus for legitimacy. Whereas discourse theory emphasizes the conditions of a legitimate consensus and could thus enable institutional economics to escape the infinite regress of judging a consensus legitimate, institutional economics has a tested social science paradigm (rational choice) of explaining and predicting the functioning of institutions. The article outlines a theoretical synthesis of the two theories by finding points in common and possibilities of fruitful combinations concerning the problem of legitimacy, institutional design and effectiveness of legal norms.

Key Words: consensus • discourse theory • effectiveness of legal rules • institutional design • legitimacy • new institutional economics

Philosophy & Social Criticism, Vol. 28, No. 4, 361-394 (2002)
DOI: 10.1177/0191453702028004523


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?