Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Philosophy & Social Criticism
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Brady, J. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

No Contest? Assessing the Agonistic Critiques of Jürgen Habermas’s Theory of the Public Sphere

John S. Brady

Department of Political Science, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA

Would democratic theory in its empirical and normative guises be in a better position without the theory of the deliberative public sphere? In this paper I explore recent theories of agonistic democracy that have answered this question in the affirmative. I question their assertionthat the theory of the public sphere should be abandoned in favor of a model of democratic politics based on political contestation. Furthermore, I explore one of the fundamental assumptionsat work in the debate about the theory of the public sphere’s status, namely the assumed opposition between consensus and contestation. Questioning the rigid nature of the opposition, I go on to argue that the deliberative theory of the public sphere actually facilitates the development of the agonistic approach to democratic theory and practice.

Key Words: agonistic democracy • deliberative democracy • democratic theory • Habermas • theory of the public sphere

Philosophy & Social Criticism, Vol. 30, No. 3, 331-354 (2004)
DOI: 10.1177/0191453704043096
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Media Culture SocietyHome page
H. Moe
Dissemination and dialogue in the public sphere: a case for public service media online
Media Culture Society, May 1, 2008; 30(3): 319 - 336.
[PDF]

Home page
 Philosophy Social CriticismHome page
J. Maclure
On the public use of practical reason: loosening the grip of neo-Kantianism
Philosophy Social Criticism, January 1, 2006; 32(1): 37 - 63.
[Abstract] [PDF]